All three can protect or save lives; and, all
three can destroy by sharp and deadly replies.
Thanks to the First and Second Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, we Americans
have freedom of speech and freedom to bear of arms, respectively. These
freedoms also mean relatively few restrictions against fiery tongues and fiery
guns.
Nevertheless, our protection from
both tongue and gun is rooted not in civil law but in the moral code.
The moral law is grounded in Jesus’ teaching
that it is
out of the heart [that]
come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries,
fornications, thefts, false witness, slanders (Matthew 15:19)
.
Therefore, the answer to a safe and civil society is not found alone in
“tighter controls” on guns and speech.
Instead, there must be a revival within institutions that nurture a
godly disposition of the heart; namely, the family and the local church, both within
the context of caring communities.
 |
| All Violence Comes Ultimately from the Heart |
I
believe government is ordained by God to establish rule of law, execute justice
for lawbreakers, and protect the nation from foreign invasion. But, for such a system to work requires both
leadership committed to just enforcement of the laws of the land; and, a
citizenry that recognizes its individual moral and ethical responsibility to
higher authority--and ultimately to God.
This relationship requires no less than a partnership between government
and religious institutions, both functioning in their respective roles to
maintain order.
While civil authorities encourage
social behavior by external laws and deterrents to anti-social behavior; family
and church nurture character qualities that promote self-restraint, personal
responsibility, and benevolence.
Alexander
Solzhenitsyn, in his essay "Repentance and Self-Limitation in the Life of
Nations," underscores the necessity of strong character in individuals if
a society is to prosper:
Whatever feelings predominate in the
members of a given society at a given moment in time, they will serve to color
the whole of that society and determine its moral character. And if there is nothing good there to pervade
that society, it will destroy itself or be brutalized by the triumph of evil
instincts no matter where the pointer of the great economic laws may turn.[i]
Although many believe that government shouldn’t “legislate morality” or “engineer”
society, still federal, state, and local governments continue to move in this
direction.
Perhaps the moral laxity and
the decay of the nuclear family have created the vacuum that government now
seeks to fill.
Leadership in Washington,
through “ObamaCare” has taken on the management of human health care and even the
‘health’ of planet Earth.
At the local
level, the city of New York is attempting to ban big sugary drinks as If to occupy
the vacuum left by an adult population that seems less responsible for both their
own nutrition and that of their children. But government efforts to legislate
individual and planetary health are both doomed to fail without a revival of
godly human character and personal responsibility.
The Bible emphasizes individual or personal responsibility under the concept of
stewardship.
Stewardship is managing that which is not
ours but has been entrusted to us by our Creator—our abilities, our time, and
our opportunities to become responsible, members of society.
Stewardship is taught in many parts of the
Bible as I have previously highlighted in
Oikonomia.
Of particular relevance here is Colossians 3:
23-24 where Paul states:
Whatever you do, do your work heartily,
as for the Lord rather than for men,
knowing that from the Lord you will receive the reward of the inheritance.
It is the Lord Christ whom you serve.
In order to fulfill our responsibility as stewards of creation, we have been
entrusted with great potential as image bearers of the Creator Himself.
We are to be God’s caretakers who represent
His interests as we rule over His creation.
But instead of representing God’s interests, our father Adam acted on
his individual interests and consequently brought God’s judgment upon him and all
his descendents.
In spite of the fall of man and the curse upon the creation, mankind was
allowed to remain as stewards of
creation.
What followed was a steady march of “human progress” in the development of
more sophisticated technology.
Each
development increased the reach and power of humans to utilize the richness of
creation’s treasures of soil, water, minerals, metals, fossil fuel, and
biodiversity.
And, with each new
technological advance from club and arrow to gun and bullet, and then, to
rocket and drone came the challenge to use the potential of that technology
either for human benefit and God’s glory, or for human destruction and God’s
dismay.
The table below lists several common technologies that are influential in
today’s culture. (Click on table to view.) The middle and right columns demonstrate that most technology
can lead to either morally “good” or “bad” outcomes.
There are differing viewpoints about the moral component of technology
[ii].
However, I believe the quality of moral
character, judgment, and personal responsibility of the individual user is the
chief determiner of whether a morally “good” or “bad” outcome will result from
the use of technology.
For example, the
same firearm used by an elementary school policeman to protect the students and
teachers from the murderous intent of intruders can also be used by the same policeman
in a fit of rage to commit the horrible act he or she is hired to prevent.
It follows that our society will not prosper
amid a myriad of guns, gadgets, and goodies unless greater attention is given
to the importance of each individual taking personal responsibility for his or
her actions.
Mass shootings like the ones at Aurora, Colorado [See
Oikononia, July
25, 2012] and Sandy Hook, Connecticut have prompted requests for new laws to
prevent such tragedies.
Sadly, the moral
and spiritual principles voiced by our clergy at memorial services for the dead
are not allowed into our public schools, universities, and halls of government
where attempts are being made to make sense of such behaviors and to prescribe
ways to stop needless killing
Dr. Alveda King told
Newsmax (March,
2013) that both her grandmother and her uncle, Dr. Martin Luther King, were
killed by guns; but her father was mysteriously killed with no gun involved.
She concludes that,
…rather than giving all of our effort to
gun control, we need to start looking at the hearts of the people and even
consider when you do things like taking prayer out of schools…or just cut off all
efforts to give people value systems, and morals…
Solzhenitsyn claimed that the only “way out” is through repentance:
What way out remains to us? Not the embittered strife of parties or
nations, not the struggle to win some elusive victory -- for all the ferocious
causes already in being -- but simply repentance and the search for our own
errors and sins. We must stop blaming
everyone else -- our neighbors and more distant peoples, our geographical,
economic, or ideological rivals, always claiming that we alone are in the right. Repentance is the first bit of firm ground
underfoot, the only one from which we can go forward not to fresh hatreds but
to concord. Repentance is the only
starting point for spiritual growth. ‘For each and every individual. For every trend of social thought.’
Shouldn’t we who are so rich and surrounded by gadgets—we who are even shaped
by them, and who are killing and being killed by them (whether gun, knife, or
pen)—shouldn’t we TAKE the only “way out?”
Solzhenitsyn’s “way out” of this rings consistent with God’s heavenly
call recorded in the Old Testament:
If…my people who are called by My name humble themselves and pray and seek My face
and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, will forgive
their sin and will heal their land (II Chronicles 7:13 (part)-14).
Taking the only way out? Perhaps during
this Holy Week, we can begin by setting aside a quiet time (away from distracting
gadgets if possible), obtain a copy of the Bible, and read God’s Word.
Christ’s “Sermon on the Mount” recorded in
Matthew Chapters 5-7 may be a good place to start.
Then, pray in communion with our Creator God,
allowing His Spirit to illuminate our reading and our medication upon His truth
claims.
After all, isn’t …
the Word of God is living and active and
sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul
and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and
intentions of the heart (Hebrews 4:12)?
Prayer: Thank you Father for being a loving God and
even “Father” to those who have simply surrendered their pride and rebellious
hearts to receive forgiveness for sin based on Christ’s sinless sacrifice on
the cross.
Help us to recognize that our
hearts are deceitfully wicked without your transforming work through your Holy
Spirit.
Without your transformation of
our dispositions from pride and hate to humility and love, no amount of man-made
legislation will bring resolution to the problems we face in our homes,
churches, schools, governments, and environment. Conversely, as we surrender to
You, be pleased to mold and shape our hearts so that we are
transformed by the renewing of our minds [so
that we may]
prove what the will of God
is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect (Romans 12:2)
.