In honor of Charlie Kirk, we are reposting this blog in which, just days ago, we asked, “How can a Christ-follower be a pleasant savor in his or her culture while also providing a moral conscience that preserves our culture against moral decline?” Charlie was the salt and a "pleasant savor" even in the midst of controversy. We pray for his family and all others who grieve.
You are the salt of the earth;
but if the salt has become tasteless,
how will it be made salty again?
It is good for nothing anymore,
except to be thrown out and trampled
underfoot by men. - Matthew 5: 13
Jesus calls His committed followers “the salt of the Earth.” He wants His followers to be distinctive and pleasant in conversation and behavior like well-seasoned food is to our taste. On the other hand, “salting” of meat by adding excess salt preserves the meat by killing the microbes that would otherwise cause spoiling. When Christ-followers take a firm stand against immoral or unethical claims or actions, they are acting to preserve our culture against decay.
Jesus’s pronouncement also comes with a stern warning. Christ-followers who allow their faith to be compromised and become lukewarm will become tasteless and their preserving witness in the culture will be dulled. Like salt that is contaminated with impurities, a compromised Christian’s witness is “good for nothing anymore.” It has become tasteless and of no value in preservation against cultural decline.
We discussed these principles in Christ’s teaching on “Salt” in Part 1 of “Winsome Witness.” [Click HERE to read.] But the question remains, “How can a Christ-follower be a pleasant savor in his or her culture while also providing a moral conscience that preserves our culture against moral decline?”
Using Too Much Salt
According to unconfirmed sources, after the Romans conquered Carthage during the Third Punic War (149–146 BCE), they plowed excess salt into the fields of Carthage to curse their soils and prevent future settlement. (Excess salt disrupts the ability of most plants to absorb water.) The very substance that can add a pleasant savor can also be a destructive agent, even a curse, to human dialog and relationships when we become careless with our words and behavior. And, there are plenty of issues in our culture that can cause us to be defensive and divided.
Listed below are a few of the major issues over which America is currently divided. One glance at this list and you may agree that any one of these issues is ripe for disagreement and debate. Admittedly, we have been guilty on several occasions of responding to others carelessly or even harshly in disagreements. We were “over-salting the soil” which otherwise might have produced a crop of good will and understanding for the glory of God. If we can agree that it is virtuous to avoid conflict in favor of respectful dialog, how can we acquire this virtue?Salting Sparingly
In our culture, it is virtually impossible to develop and sustain a close relationship with anyone without encountering differences of opinion. So, how can we avoid alienating others with whom we disagree, especially when we believe our position is the right one?
1. Guard Your Heart: Before speaking, we should ask ourselves, “What is my purpose in entering into a conversation that will be charged with moral and political implications? Is it my goal simply to win a debate and gain power or prestige? Or, instead, will I aim for understanding and peace, led by the Spirit of Christ, the Prince of Peace?
2. Watch Your Tongue; Open Your Ears: If our spirit and our intentions are aligned with God’s Spirit, then our tongues will follow; for our mouth speaks from that which fills the heart (Luke 6: 45).
3. Establish Mutual Respect: Mutual respect is essential for all enduring relationships. As mutual respect grows, we can be less restrained in dealing with potentially controversial topics. Once a respectful dialog is established, it is likely that a thoughtful analysis of the issue will follow. There is a good chance of either reaching agreement; or if necessary, politely agreeing to disagree.
4. Recognize Differences in Worldview: Disagreements often point to differences in our worldview. Our worldview is an internally coherent and consistent framework or lens through which we can view, understand, and relate to the world around us. [Read more HERE.] If our worldviews differ, we may each be reasoning logically, but because our “lenses” through which we view the world differ, we are each reasoning from a very different starting point. Here again, we may need to agree to disagree based on mutual respect.
5. Analyze the Issue Carefully: Different worldviews may cause each of us to react differently to an event like the murder of 15-year-old Luis Lopez. Then, there may be differences in how the news media report the event. Some news sources may not emphasize the fact that this teen was murdered while defending his mother from an assault by an illegal migrant. Also, differences in personality can influence how we respond to this news. Some of us will be influenced more emotionally, while others will take a more analytical approach. Then, we must factor in our past experiences, political affiliation, philosophy of governance, and views on the importance of the nuclear family, moral upbringing, law and order, and due process of law. A calm, rational dialog will be necessary to identify these variables and consider their importance in a respectful manner.
Given the potentially controversial nature of the issues surrounding the murder of Luis Lopez, we hope this case can illustrate how we might apply the above five considerations to establish a polite and constructive conversation. Table 2 below offers conversation points we might use to discuss issues relating to this murder case in the context of “Immigration Policy and Citizenship” noted in Table 1. We hope this table will also apply in discussion of other potentially divisive issues.
Salt, Mediators, and Peacemakers
We began this blog by asking how a Christ-follower can be a pleasant savor in his or her culture while also providing a moral conscience in the midst of cultural decline. We believe the answer to both is to radiate the sweetness of character and winsome behavior of Christ. This means that rather than simply winning arguments we must aim toward winning souls for Christ. Jesus came as God in human form and became a servant even to the point of death on a Roman cross. Then, He rose again to sit at the right hand of God and now serves as our Savior and Mediator between a Holy God and sinful humankind. When we confess our sin and surrender our lives to Christ, He serves as our Mediator and settles the debt caused by our sins against God. We become one in Him when we are baptized into Him as Romans 6: 3-4 states.
Being made one with Christ and being Spirit-filled ought to inspire us to be mediators and peacemakers. Michael Zeytoonian, Director of the Dispute Resolution Counsel, relates conflict resolution to the role of Christ as our Mediator when he writes:
“There is this ‘place of one’ in every dispute and it offers the most complete resolution. It is different for each team of rivals and each situation. In order to fulfill the law, the Mediator’s higher purpose is to transform the minds of the two sides, so that they can go beyond just settling, to find, or perhaps rediscover, their “place of one.” [Read more HERE.]
All of this sounds good. But is it possible in our divided nation and world? The Scriptures do not gloss over the difficulty we will face. Jesus said, Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God. Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5: 9-10). Just a few verses after this statement (v. 13), Jesus said to His followers, “you are the salt of the Earth. He made both claims in the context of a troubled world about which He later said, These things I have spoken to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world (John 16: 33).”
Yielding for a Greater Gain
It is clear from the teachings of Jesus that although we are to be “salt” that produces a pleasant savor in conversations with others, we will not always expect a kind response. The most respectful words and Christ-like witness may be met with rejection and even outright persecution as was experienced by the prophets (Matthew 5: 11-12). Our human reaction is often to press beyond respectful limits to “prove our point” or “settle accounts” or “level the playing field.” We are tempted to act as if the equity sought by many in our culture is within our grasp. But it is better to “lose” a debate and radiate the character of Christ who while being reviled, He did not revile in return; while suffering, He uttered no threats, but kept entrusting Himself to Him who judges righteously… (1 Peter 2: 23). Jesus entrusted Himself to His Father because He remembered, according to Psalm 96: 10, The LORD reigns; Indeed, the world is firmly established, it will not be moved; He will judge the peoples with equity.
Today, many Christ-followers, some of whom we know, are suffering dearly for their faith. Our prayer as we close is that our persecuted brethren and all of us who love Jesus Christ will find comfort in the balanced teaching of the Apostle Peter:
Who is there to harm you if you prove zealous for what is good? But even if you should suffer for the sake of righteousness, you are blessed. AND DO NOT FEAR THEIR INTIMIDATION, AND DO NOT BE TROUBLED, but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence; and keep a good conscience so that in the thing in which you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ will be put to shame. For it is better, if God should will it so, that you suffer for doing what is right rather than for doing what is wrong. For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit; -- 1 Peter 3: 13-18
Questions for Readers:
What are we missing? Or misunderstanding?
What do you find most difficult when you are having a conversation that approaches a controversial topic?
What advice can you offer based on your experience?
Please use the "Comment" link below or e-mail to silviusj@gmail.com