Two of the most amazing relationships on Earth are sexual
reproduction and the subsequent maternal nurturing of offspring.
Both processes involve complex coordination
of form and function in both animals and seed plants.
Human sexuality is unique according to the
Judeo-Christian Scriptures because it has both moral and biological
significance. Moral commitment to marriage and responsible parenting within the
family unit determine the character of each subsequent generation.
Indeed, many scholars argue that human
civilizations have risen and fallen in accordance with their respect for the
institutions of heterosexual marriage and family.
Today, the foundation of heterosexual marriage and the family is being
undermined by a growing disregard for the moral teachings of
the Bible. Our pluralistic society has
increasingly viewed Christianity as only one
among many “religions” from which to
choose.
Moral relativism has made it
very easy for traditional marriage and family to become marginalized.
As a result, some scholars have pointed to the
order and
purpose within the natural world as a basis for establishing moral and ethical values and human
choices apart from “religion”
per se.
For example, the fruitfulness of the host of
different species of vertebrate animals owes its success generally to the faithful
nurturing of offspring by the parent generation.
Those who know this fact, regardless on their “religion,”
conclude there is something inherently very wrong with wanton abuse or killing
of animals or their young.
Natural
law ethics is based on the belief that by observing the order, harmony,
and beauty in nature, we can intuitively reason that we have a moral and ethical
obligation to respond properly to it.
It follows that senseless abuse or killing of an animal
or human being is a moral and ethical violation of
natural law because such acts disrupt a purposeful, forward progression in nature.
In a previous
Oikonomia, entitled
Stewardship
of Creation and “Natural Law” we emphasized that natural law ethics are consistent with what we learn
in Genesis when it claims that there is order and purpose in the natural world,
and that mankind is both capable and responsible for discerning this order and
purpose. There we also affirmed that application
of natural law ethics can inform the biblical mandate for stewardship of God's creation (Genesis 2: 15) through transformation of
our character. The steward who takes
time to discern the order and purpose in nature (creation) will strive to learn
more about her surroundings and how her actions will influence
that order and purposeful progression.
Therefore, we believe that a robust environmental stewardship
ethic can arise from a merger of natural law ethics and Judeo-Christian
ethics.
Like Genesis 1-2, Romans 1: 16-22 emphasizes mankind's responsibility as stewards of God's truth and righteousness (v. 16-18). Here, we also learn that God has given us the ability to know Him personally (v. 19), to understand and be in awe of His great power in
creation (v. 20), and to live with thankfulness and reverence toward Him (v.
21).
Instead, mankind suppressed the truth
revealed through the order and unity of creation (v. 18) and followed futile
speculations and false reasoning (v. 21-22).
This suppression of truth describes the actions of those who, in spite of the evidence of order and
purpose in creation and what their conscience tells them, choose to defy and
act contrary to both natural law and God’s divine revelation in Scripture.
In other words, mankind’s rebellion is
demonstrated by his rejection of “two books of revelation”—the
natural revelation and the
divine revelation in Scripture.
Most agree that the divine revelation in the Judeo-Christian Scriptures clearly
supports laws against murder.
But, even apart from the biblical teaching, we see that natural
law ethics provide a strong moral argument against murder. Murder brings a crashing halt to the intricate order
of life processes in the human body and smashes the purposes, hopes, and
dreams of a precious, living being.
Unless his sensibility, reason, and conscience are seared, mankind's reaction to senseless killing of human and animal alike is to feel deeply the wrongness of it. Because of an innate sense of right and wrong, the one who kills needlessly may live in misery
and regret even without knowledge of the Bible's command, "Thou shall not murder (Matthew 5: 21-22)."
Today, slightly more than half of Americans polled oppose the practice of
abortion under most or all circumstances.
Opponents of the pro-life position argue that abortion is not murder
because human life does not begin until some point in late-term or at birth. However,
this argument is strongly opposed on the basis of natural law ethics.
Here, one can argue that it is wrong to
interrupt the orderly and purposeful progression of human development which
normally advances in a seamless fashion from fertilized
ovum to a fully formed human in the mother’s womb.
There is literally no identifiable stage in human development other than conception to mark as the beginning of an individual human life.
Those who accuse pro-lifers of causing the guilt and misery in women who
have chosen abortion often want to silence Christians and their moral stand.
But, if it is true that natural
law ethics provides a strong case against abortion, then emotional and physical
consequences may be expected even if Christianity could be erased from our
culture.
In support of this notion, recent scientific findings are uncovering more subtle and
unexpected consequences of the abuse of the natural order of human reproduction.
First, there is growing evidence that abortion tends to diminish and even
jeopardize the life of the mother. The Post-Abortion Depression Research and Care Act of 2007
which cites evidence of "severe and long-term effects" of abortion on
women, including depression, eating disorders, suicide attempts, intense grief,
emotional numbness, rage, sexual dysfunction, and relationship difficulties.” [Click
HERE to read H.R. 1457.] According to a report published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, “An analysis of 22 studies on abortion and mental health showed that women who had an abortion faced an ‘81% increased risk of mental health problems’ and that nearly 10% of the incidence of mental health problems was ‘shown to be directly attributable to abortion.’” [Click
HERE to read more.]
Another study reports similar emotional
disruptions in the fathers of aborted children [Click
HERE to read more.].
Those who blame the emotional consequences of abortion on pro-lifers who create
a moral stigma against abortion cannot be totally disregarded.
After all, history reveals that voices of
moral opposition have in at least some instances served to keep cultures from
drifting into immoral practices.
However, scientific research from Scandinavia where there is even less
social opposition to abortion than in America nonetheless reports that the suicide rate is 40
percent higher in the first year after an abortion [Click
HERE to read more.].
There are both emotional and biological consequences to interrupting the natural progression of human development. Commenting on the same study, Dr. Camilla Hersh,
American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, adds “For
every abortion a woman has, her risk of having a premature baby goes up 30
percent. It’s 30 percent higher with the first one, 60 percent with the second.”
What is the take-home message of these statistics?
It seems that when human development within
the woman’s body is interrupted with an abortion, we encounter
consequences that are deeply rooted in the natural order, design, and purposes for
sexuality and reproduction in the female body.
When these processes are thwarted in their purpose, the consequences
play out in the form of not only emotional imbalances but also biological
disruptions as expressed in the tendency of premature births.
As ethically wrong as it is to take the life
of an unborn child, we must also consider the apparently unavoidable biological
consequences produced in the mother. But first, I want to address some words of comfort and admonition to those who have chosen to abort a child.
Readers who have chosen to abort one or more unborn children may be experiencing emotional or biological effects right now. If so, I do not want to
add to your grief.
Nor do I want to treat you
as a statistic.
Although I believe
abortion is a violation of both natural law and divinely revealed moral law,
there is comfort and forgiveness to be found in God’s mercy as revealed in the
Bible.
I pray that you will read Psalm 139 and pursue God to find His answer for bondage to sin and guilt. Christ will cleanse even your conscience from
sin (Hebrews 9: 11-14) as you surrender to Him. Then you will recognize your sin as the cause of your anguish, and stop blaming
Christians and their "moral hangups" for your guilt and unrest. I would encourage you to
visit
Oikonomia, August 30, 2015. Near the end of that article, start reading
with
“How About It? where you will find an invitation to consider
the “Good News” (Gospel) of Christ.
There is also a link to a helpful outline, called “
What Are
the Four Spiritual Laws?” This resource presents the Gospel and invites you to
consider the salvation and forgiveness of Christ that is available to all of us
sinners.
You are also
welcome to e-mail me if you have particular questions
(silviusj@cedarville.edu).
 |
Scientists are discovering a "beautiful
cooperation" between
mother and the unborn child that lasts long after birth.
|
We have seen that interruption of the natural order of human sexual
reproduction by abortion can have serious negative effects.
But, on a more
positive note, science is discovering even more evidence of amazing benefits to
mothers who “choose life” and do not disrupt the natural order of the processes
of prenatal development.
Rheumatologist J.
Lee Nelson, of the University of Washington, speaking to
NPR
Radio, explained findings from her laboratory that an unborn baby’s
cells can move through the placenta and into the mother’s bloodstream where
they can enter her heart, brain, liver, and other organs.
These cells can act like stem cells and
transform into other cell types that can form collagen, participate in wound
healing, and even reduce the risk the mother will develop cancer or rheumatoid
arthritis.
The mother’s cells, including
cells from previous pregnancies, can also cross through the placenta and into her baby,
thus providing a biological linkage among siblings.
Dr. Nelson calls it “a beautiful cooperation”
between a mother and her unborn child.
I close with two points for your consideration.
First, even if one doesn’t recognize the authority of the
Judeo-Christian Scriptures that defend the sanctity of human life, there is
reason to consider the claims of natural law ethics.
Natural law ethics offer a robust defense of
sanctity of human life and this ethic is strengthened as science continues to
reveal the marvelous array of intricate relationships involved in prenatal human
development.
By providing both disincentives and incentives, nature apart from the Bible calls out to us, "Choose Life!"
Second, we should take more seriously every aspect of our stewardship of the
natural world.
The notion of “natural
law” should humble us to realize our part in an amazing order of creation which
speaks of order, design, and purpose.
We
should avoid actions that thwart obvious purposes at work in nature, especially
to needlessly jeopardize our own life or the life of another human or
creature.
However, natural law ethics
alone cannot inform us of the Great Cause of the order and design of
creation.
Only the divine revelation of
Scriptures can explain our moral depravity and our need for salvation through
faith in Christ Who died as our atoning sacrifice (
e.g. John 3: 16).
Creation
displays an order, pattern, and purpose that points to God as Creator.
And this is the Creator Who is affirmed in the
divine revelation of Scripture as the God Whose
invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been
clearly seen being understood through what has been made, so that they are
without excuse (Romans 1: 20)
.
…
God is forever seeking to speak Himself
out to His creation. The whole Bible supports the idea. God is speaking. Not
God spoke, but God is speaking. He is by His nature continuously articulate. He
fills the world with His speaking Voice.
(From:
A.W. Tozer,
“The Speaking Voice”, in
The Pursuit of God (Regal)
How About You?
Are you sensitive to God speaking to you as you observe the "book of nature" with its display of the order and
purpose of life all around you? Do you also sense God's invitation for you to consider the "book of His inspired Word," the Bible, which assures you of His love and victorious life when you seek out
and follow His plan and purposes? Want
to share your thoughts or a question?
I’d love to hear from you. Just
use the “Comment” box below.