The
world is changing around us at a steady pace.
However, our awareness of change is usually clouded from our view
because it occurs slowly and incrementally.
A fitting analogy is that we can barely detect the movement of the minute
hand on a clock as it measures the progression of time. But it moves unrelentingly forward
nonetheless. Likewise, the darkness
before dawn contrasts sharply with the noonday sun. However, the human eye cannot detect the
gradual brightening of the dawn as time passes unless we snap photos periodically and compare them. Similarly, our personal maturation in body,
mind, spirit, and character; and our mastery of manual and athletic skills all
occur gradually with much patience and endurance.
Our mirrors remind us that our faces are wrinkling and our hair is thinning. Thankfully, these changes occur so gradually
that they are unnoticed by us, and even by our friends who assure us that we
“haven’t changed a bit.” But, all flattering
aside, few of us deny that our bodies “they are a changing.” So are the times in which we live. Although one day may be the same as the next,
still our calendars all have special days.
We celebrate events like births, marriages, and graduations, while others
like hospitalizations and deaths of loved ones can be sudden “wake-up calls.” Whether they bring joy or sadness, we can
benefit from pausing to reflect on both our celebrations and our sudden “wake-up
calls.”
“Wake-Up Calls”
This article is Part 2 of “Is Light Dimming and Darkness Winning?” In Part 1 we described three “Christmas
Contrasts.” These contrasts
become evident when we consider two major groups of people and how they
celebrate Christmas. While many
celebrate Christmas with lights and gifts, only one of the groups knows the
true meaning of these traditions. Sadly,
the other group misses this joy because they do not know Jesus personally as
the “Light of the World” and “God’s greatest Gift”—i.e. Everlasting Life
in Him-- forever (John 3).
Just as there are two ways to celebrate Christmas, so there are two major views
of time. The Apostle Peter describes one
view, expressed by the mockers who ask, “Where is the promise of His [Christ’s]
coming? For ever since the fathers fell
asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation (2
Peter 3: 4).” This view resembles
that of deism. Deists will
acknowledge a Creator God, but believes God has wound up the clock of time and
then simply allows events to play themselves out in the world without His intervention. Peter goes on to say that those who hold this
view of a non-intervening God have forgotten that God does intervene and even
directs the human drama. To make his
point, Peter reminds deniers of the time in which the world was destroyed,
being flooded with water (2 Peter 3: 6b).
The historical reality of a world-wide flood at the time of Noah is
supported by geological studies.
The span of “geological history” suggests there were long periods without
evidence of change. But these periods of
stasis were markedly disrupted by events such as volcanic eruptions, changes in
sea level, and climate change. We should
note that not all geologists today believe that “long periods of time” amounted
to billions of years.
Young-Earth geologists like Dr. John Whitmore, a professor at Cedarville University, have
published scientific data [See HERE.]
and given talks [See HERE.] explaining
that the supposed “long geologic periods” are in fact not so long. John’s studies of the geology of places like the Grand Canyon and Mt. St. Helens suggest evidence that these geologic formations have resulted from short-term cataclysmic events that caused massive movement and deposition of sediments followed soon by erosion on a grand scale. Dr. Whitmore integrates his findings with the
biblical revelation to explain these events.
[See “Does Science Trump Theology in the Pursuit of Truth?” Click HERE.]
The biblical timeline of human history corroborates the geologic and
archeological data and together they affirm the reality of God’s interventions
of judgment and deliverance. The peace
and perfection of the Garden of Eden was interrupted when Adam and Eve chose to
disbelieve and dishonor God’s Word, allowing sin and Satan to bring corruption
into creation. Later, God’s judgment
upon the descendants of Adam and Eve came through the flood in which only Noah,
his wife, and family were spared. To
date, this global flood must have been a tremendous “wake-up” call. After the flood, God introduced Noah and
family to a world that had been greatly altered geologically, ecologically, and
meteorologically during and after the global flood.
When the descendants of Noah became corrupted and brought great violence and
turmoil upon the Earth, God called Abraham to leave his heathen civilization. By faith, Abraham believed God’s promise that
He would make of his descendants into a new nation. The Abrahamic Covenant led to creation of the nation
of Israel whose long history of change was characterized by gradual descent
into sin and repeated warnings by God’s prophets, eventually punctuated by
God’s abrupt judgment and deliverances.
One of the most noteworthy of God’s judgments upon the Southern Kingdom of Israel
(i.e. Judah) occurred around 600 BC.
The prophet Isaiah warned Ahaz, king of Judah, that if Judah followed in
the idolatry and rebellion of the Northern Kingdom which was eventually
conquered by Assyria, they would also face God’s judgment. But Judah did not heed the prophet’s wake-up
calls, and after Isaiah’s time they fell to the Babylonians in 586 BC. Those Israelites who survived a long siege of
Jerusalem were carried off to endure a 70-year exile in Babylon. Isaiah had not only predicted the Babylonian
captivity before he died, but boldly challenged God’s Chosen people to be ready
to return to the Holy Land after their captivity had ended. The the nation of Israel would then exist for 400 years with no revelation from God before the announcement of the coming of Christ whose humble birth is the central reference point for how we mark time in years on our calendars.
A "Wake-Up Call" for 2024
Our focus has been on the theme of “gradual changes over time, punctuated by
“wake-up calls.”
We have noted that this pattern is evident throughout human history and even in
geological history. Finally, we have
seen that it matters to God how we respond to His commands and to the apparent “interruptions” that He allows in
the progression of time. But before we conclude, we should realize that, as we enter 2024, this year has the potential to be the most turbulent year history has known, at least in recent times. How many "wake-up calls" could be in store for us in 2024?
We would like to think that readers of Oikonomia are regularly attentive to national and world news. For these informed readers, we need only to mention a series of key words and you would almost immediately be able to give an impromptu explanation of how each could be a "powder keg" for a major national or global "wake-up call." Below is our listing which is not exhaustive:
Add to these disturbing developments the warning we conveyed in Part 1 of "Is Light Dimming and Darkness Winning?" [Click HERE.] Recall, we referenced the book by Eric Metaxas, Letter to the American Church (Salem Books, 2022) in which this author warns the American Church that it is following the same path as the German Church in the 1930's which was largely silent in the face of the rise of Adolph Hitler.
Taken together our listing of sources of "wake-up calls" is enough to keep us up at night. It is not our intent to push us into panic mode. Instead, we each need to be alert in mind, body, and spirit and vigilant to maintain our individual love and obedience to God and our integrity toward our neighbor. If this article serves to awaken us to the urgency of our times and be more committed to the Commission given by Jesus Christ (Matthew 28: 18-20), we will have succeeded.
Starting Strong in 2024
As 2024 begins, how can we prepare to respond to God’s “wake-up calls?” As part of our own New Year meditations in
Scripture, we have written a series of eight short devotional meditations based on our
study of Isaiah Chapter 52. We encourage
you to visit “Eight Devotional Meditations for the New
Year” by clicking HERE. We hope your reading, study, and prayer over
each of these meditations will help to “awaken you” in mind, body, and spirit
as you begin this New Year. To start "Day 1" of the devotional series, click HERE.
οἰκονομία, (oy-kon-om-ee'-ah), Greek for STEWARDSHIP, a fundamental concept through which Christians can integrate issues of SCIENCE, FAITH, and CULTURE.
Showing posts with label worldview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label worldview. Show all posts
Friday, January 12, 2024
Monday, June 13, 2022
Feeling, Knowing, and Believing
Our world is changing. At an ever-increasing pace, these changes are impacting family and societal relationships, value of our currency, health care, education, employment, and constitutional rights. All of these can impact our emotional, rational, and spiritual sense of well-being and our outlook on the future. On any given day or even hour of the day, if we are asked how we are doing, we might choose a different emoji to describe our feelings.
Complexity of issues, sheer volume of information, and politically biased reporting make it more and more challenging to stay accurately informed. Rational thinking skills and wise decision-making based on objective reporting of information are becoming more and more critical—and harder to find. In this article, we consider some challenges we face and some factors to consider in order to navigate them wisely.
To begin, let’s say that someone asks us a question. There are several ways we might respond:
(1) “I feel ….”
(2) “I think ….”
When someone asks us how we are feeling, we typically reply with #1, “I feel….” Responses #2 and #3 are how we might begin to share our opinion or a faith-based answer, respectively. Let’s consider Response #1 first.
Emotional Responses
Our “feelings” are an important part of our self-awareness and our physical and emotional health. Our physical and emotional health require that we maintain a relationship with at least one person; or if necessary, with pet animal. We are strengthened and encouraged through face-to-face communication with others or through letters, phone calls, and social media.
Many of us have pressed “smiley face” stickers on our letters to convey a wordless message of encouragement. Now that we have cell phone apps, we can digitally insert our choice of emojis along with our text messages and e-mails to communicate briefly how we are “feeling” about something in a wordless fashion.
Health professionals routinely ask their patients how they feel before or after a medical procedure. Recognizing the difficulty that some patients have in expressing how much pain they actually “feel,” medical facilities often post a “pain scale” consisting of cartoon faces ranging from very distraught (“worst pain imaginable”) to a smiling face (“no pain”). Health care professionals and all of us need to be aware that a person’s “feelings” have roots that go deeper than physical pain and reach into our emotional and spiritual state.
For many of us, it is easier to describe “how we feel” when someone asks us about our physical pain than when they ask “how we feel about our pain.” How we feel about joint-replacement surgery during recovery is affected by both the severity of our physical pain and by the degree of our concern about whether we will ever recover. Some people recover very quickly and have a positive outlook all the way through their pain and physical therapy. Others struggle with both the physical pain and the related fear it causes. Why is this? The truth is, how we see our condition at a given time depends on our physical condition (1, “how we feel”) and our frame of mind (2, “how we think about” our situation. The differences in how different people respond to similar situations also depends on how they “choose to think” about their situation.
Rational, Faith-Grounded Responses
Dr. Caroline Leaf, a communication pathologist and audiologist has conducted research for years in the field of cognitive neuroscience. She believes that God created our minds in His image and has given us the free will to choose “how we will think” and react to our circumstances. Therefore, Dr. Leaf has based her research on God’s revelation in Scriptures. In Romans 12: 2, God commands us to be transformed by the renewing of your mind, and in Deuteronomy 30: 19, God lovingly invites us to choose life in order that you may live….
Dr. Leaf integrates this Scriptural principle with neuroscience in her book entitled Switch on Your Brain (Baker Books, 2013). She writes,
Free will and choice are real, spiritual, and scientific facts. Your mind (soul) has one foot in the door of the spirit and one foot in the door of the body; you can change your brain with your mind and essentially renew your mind.
The author cites scientific research pointing to a cause-and-effect relationship between “what we believe” (Response #3 above) about God and our capacity to overcome challenges to physical health.
As we have cited in a March 22, 2020 Oikonomia article, Dr. Leaf describes a University of Miami study of patients being treated for (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). The researchers concluded that the most significant factor affecting healing in HIV-infected patients “was their choice to believe in a benevolent and loving God.” These kinds of scientific findings emphasize the important link between “how we think” (2), how we “choose to think,” and “what we believe” (3). [Note: We also recognize that in the eternal span of time before each of us came into being as creatures in God’s image, capable of making choices, He chose us in Him (Christ) before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will…(Ephesians 1: 4-5). The "Doctrine of Election" is a subject for another time, but those who wish to study the subject can begin HERE with a resource by Dr. John MacArthur.]
Although feeling, thinking, and believing are interconnected, “feeling” is heavily based on our physical senses; whereas, “thinking and believing” are heavily based on our rational ability, our faith, and our worldview that forms through our experience and learning.
How would you respond if someone were to ask you, “Do you believe there is a God?” Which of the following would your choose to begin your response:
(1) “I feel ….”
(2) “I think ….”
(3) “I believe ….”
Clearly, our response to “the God question” cannot be based solely upon “what we feel” or “what we think.” Unless we claim to be God, we have no capacity to claim whether or not God exists. However, it appears that more and more people are presuming to take the place of God when they deny the existence of objective truth. The term objective truth applies to a proposition that is considered true no matter what we believe to be the case.
Worldview by "Cut-and-Paste"
We have amassed great knowledge, yet increasing numbers of people question whether objective truth even exists. This trend is supported by a recent study.
Based on a survey of 2,000 adult Americans (1,000 by phone; 1,000 online) taken in February, 2021 by George Barna, over half (54%) embrace the postmodern idea that all truth is subjective and there are no moral absolutes. Barna concludes (emphasis added), “We’re just at a place in our country’s history now where that’s the default view. Most people would say all truth is subjective and there’s no kind of objective truth based on an external standard. They would say they’re the standard that determines what truth is.”
Barna’s survey, conducted through the Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University, offered a series of questions designed to determine the personal worldview of each respondent. The results, reported in the American Worldview Inventory 2021, are very disturbing, not because of the views expressed but because the views were not based on well informed and coherent thinking.
Based on the respondents’ answers to the questions, only 6% were identified as truly holding to a “biblical worldview.” Given this low percentage, it is at first puzzling that the biblical worldview was “the most prolific of the seven worldviews tested.” Another approximately 6% of respondents were scattered among six other worldviews with no more than 2% qualifying to be assigned to any one of the six particular worldviews (see table). What about the remaining 88% of respondents?
Instead of “developing an internally consistent and philosophically coherent perspective on life,” 88% of Americans are adopting points of view or actions that feel comfortable or seem most convenient” – i.e. using a cut-and-paste approach to making sense of, and responding to life.” As a result, most Americans who claim adherence to a given belief system are insufficiently developed in both their intellectual understanding and in their behavior and lifestyle to qualify them as being true representatives” of that particular worldview. For example, 9% of respondents “have a moderately strong set of beliefs and behaviors related to Marxism, Eastern Mysticism, or Nihilism, but “an insufficient breadth of such beliefs and behaviors to qualify as being a true representative of any of those worldviews.”
Feelings Rationally Grounded
Returning to our range of responses, feeling, thinking, and believing, we can explain at least one cause of the troubling trend detected by George Barna’s 2021 worldview inventory; namely, emotion-driven reactions and decisions are replacing those based on careful exercise of critical reasoning. At the very time when our culture faces both great societal challenges and great tools for addressing these challenges, we seem least prepared to respond emotionally, rationally, and spiritually.
The table below lists seven major societal issues followed by a brief statement we might commonly hear in the media or in conversation. Notice the prominence of an emotional component in the responses. However, even though compassion and empathy are important qualities we ought to express toward those who are struggling, these qualities must be guided by rational and moral policies if we are going to solve these problems.
Each of these societal concerns have grown out of a history of what many believe are deviations from God’s commands revealed in the Bible. The Old Testament, in Exodus 20, reveals how God gave His chosen people, the Israelites, the Ten Commandments, or the ten “Thou shalt not’s.” God’s purpose was not to “steal their joy” but to give them a moral foundation for a society that would protect them from evil and help them become a “shining city on a hill” for the rest of the world to see and want to copy. To the extent that Israel followed these commands, they prospered. But deviations from these spiritual laws gradually caused the Jewish nation to lose their godly distinctions and eventually to be exiled by pagan nations.
Out of His mercy in order to redeem His people Israel, God came in the incarnate form of His Son, Jesus Christ. Jesus came not to replace the Law but to fulfill the Law through His sinless life, atoning death on the Cross, and resurrection in victory over death that whoever believes in Him as their Savior from sin “should not perish but have everlasting life (John 3: 16).” Jesus added,
For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil (John 3: 17-19).
God has already come to us with objective truth claims in the Bible that He is the Creator, His creation reveals His power and nature, and that it is so obvious that we are without excuse if we deny it (Romans 1: 20). The Apostle Paul elaborates about how the tendency of mankind has been to reject and suppress God’s truth (Romans 1: 18). Those who reject God’s truth, will fall prey to accepting nonsense and be morally and spiritually corrupted to the core of their lives. Paul described this awful result in Romans 1: 21-23:
For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.
The rest of Romans 1 reveals the tragic downward path of those who reject God’s authority and absolute truth. They are left to live in the darkness of moral relativism in which “truth” is what each individual deems it to be. Returning to the seven (7) commonly heard statements above we can see how each cultural problem results from a deviation from the moral standards given in Scripture. Each statement is also rooted in one or more misconceptions expressed by a person who has rejected or is ignorant of God’s moral and ethical principles. In each of the seven, we briefly point out how the problem can be corrected by addressing the deviation from God’s ideal. However, in no way do we want to imply that the solutions are simple.
Summary: Feeling, Thinking, Believing
In summary, each of us have physical, emotional, rational, and spiritual dimension to our lives. All of these are interrelated components of our personality; but by itself, each is limited as a way of knowing and judging truth and reality. We may answer a question about “how we feel” in words, or by our facial expression, or by pointing to a cartoon face or an emoji. However, to answer questions related to “how we feel about” or “how we choose to react” to our situation, we must draw more heavily upon our rational and spiritual components. We must be aware of our worldview and what we are basing our reasoning upon. Recall Barna’s statistics on poorly grounded worldviews?
Thinking carelessly and communicating with tweets and emojis will not be adequate. And problems in family, church, community, and government resulting from rejection of God’s revealed wisdom in the Bible will certainly not be solved by atheistic, humanistic approaches. First Corinthians 2: 14 states, the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
The proper function of family, church, school, private corporations, and government depends upon documents such as the U.S. Constitution as well as various bylaws, legal codes, and covenants, all written in words in a rational manner. Most of these in turn, rest upon the objective revelation of the Bible concerning the nature of man. Due to our tendency to lust for power, there is a need to avoid the concentration of power and its corrupting influence, and to incorporate ways to hold individuals morally and spiritually accountable.
God’s Word makes clear that ultimate reality is not this physical, temporary universe which we can see, hear, touch, taste and smell. We can only discern spiritual reality when we submit to the Word of God and His Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 2: 13) to renew our minds (Romans 12: 2) and teach us to discern spiritual truth (John 14: 26). Then, the Peace of God will replace our anxious feelings, and His love and care will uphold us for the challenges we face.
We hope this article will help you toward better discernment of issues in our world through proper exercise of your capacities for feeling, knowing, and believing. As always, we welcome your “Comments” using the link below; or, please write privately to silviusj@gmail.com. You may want to express how you feel, or what you think about this article, and share what you believe and why.
Monday, May 9, 2022
Reflections at Age Seventy-five
Seventy-five years ago today I was born into this world. I was a brand-new kid, but the “slate” of my life was not blank. It had already been written upon by the hand of Providence through my genetic inheritance and the environment of my mother’s womb. My genes, located on 23 chromosomes from my mother and an equal number from my father, plus some extra genes from the cytoplasm of my mother’s ovum, have so far served me well.
Worldview from the Womb
The 9-month period within mother’s womb must have been a pleasant one. Thankfully, my “warm womb world” was safe from any violent physical intrusion. It was also safe from chemical intrusion and from unfavorable nutritional or narcotic consumption by my mother that might otherwise have introduced epigenetic triggers that could have affected my development through altered gene expression (See link HERE.). Very likely, by the time I entered the bright lights of this world on May 9, 1947 in Dover, Ohio, I was already acquainted with the feeling of my mother’s warmth, her loving voice, and her caring hands.
Although I was born with a slate already partly written upon, it came with many questions and many “blanks to fill.” You see, like all human beings, I was hard-wired with an inborn need to know myself and the world into which I was born. I began my search for answers to these questions through personal experience and eventually, through reading. Later, I learned that the answers I found and accepted were shaping within me what many call my worldview. Our worldview is an internally coherent and consistent framework or lens through which we can view, understand, and relate to the world around us.
For purposes of this article, we suggest that each of us are prone to address four basic questions. How we answer them will help shape our worldview:
Reality: What is true?
Identity: Who am I?
Morality: What is good and evil?
Justification: What is my purpose and destiny? How each of us answer these four questions is absolutely fundamental to how we each will function socially and professionally. Maybe you will relate personally (or maybe not) as I share how I believe my own personal worldview has developed.
Reality: What is True?
One of my first lessons began on my first birthday. It had to do with who and what I could trust. Everywhere I went, I depended on “the handlers”—first the nurses, then my mother. Soon I learned to trust and feel safe in the (usually) warm hands of my mother and the larger, rougher hands of my father. I soon felt other tangible things: the warm, tasty, nourishing milk from my mother’s breasts, and then from a baby bottle. I felt the relief from a wet, itchy diaper when it was replaced by a warm, dry one. I soon learned that when I felt uncomfortable or fearful, I would spontaneously cry out with strange sounds. My cries brought results—my mother’s caring hands, a dry diaper, and her warm embrace. I felt safe. I felt valued and loved.
My “reality” was already beginning to rest upon both material and non-material things. I began to put my faith in things that I could touch and see. When they appeared often enough and consistently enough, I considered them “real.” I was beginning to “real-ize” a certain inner satisfaction that depended upon my physical senses of touch, taste, sight, hearing, and smelling. But inseparably linked to my physical senses was a real and growing sensation of peace and joy that came from how my needs were being met—warmly, lovingly, consistently. For example, my mother and father touched and handled me tenderly in a way that conveyed something wonderful beyond the physical. I could repeatedly feel safe, valued, loved. I could see my parents’ smiles and hear pleasant, loving words from them, and between them. Because they were faithfully on schedule to provide food, dry clothes, and nap times, I learned something about time—sunny daytime, dark nighttime.
Even before I could eat solid food, my worldview was developing. I was finding satisfaction from both the seen and the unseen. I was coming to accept as real, true and truth a statement from God’s book, the Bible: “Faith shows the reality of what we hope for; it is the evidence of things we cannot see. (Hebrews 11: 1 NLT).” I became more aware of my growing personal faith as I progressed from confirming what is true, then believing it as truth, and then placing my trust in it through decisions and actions.
Identity: Who Am I?
While I was realizing that my mother and father were regularly and lovingly providing for my needs, I was also hearing sounds that they associated with me. Words like “baby” and “bottle” and “bedtime” became familiar. I soon associated “mommy” with my mother, and “daddy” with my father. Most affectionately identified with me was the frequent sound of the word, “Johnny.” I began to realize that everything had a name, and soon it seemed natural that my ears would perk up when I heard someone say, “Johnny.”
When I became what is called a “toddler,” I met some larger kids whom I later learned were my older cousins. I also discovered that my mother and father each had their own mother and father. My mother’s mother and father showed more love and kindness to me than my dad’s parents but I liked being with them all. They were each different from one other, and each had their own names. But to me, they became known as “Grandpa” and “Grandma.”
During the summer months, I was able to go outside into a large, green world. Both my parents and grandparents liked to work outside. They showed me things like animals and flowers. I soon discovered that animals came in different forms like cats and dogs, chickens and cows. The flowers also came in predictable patterns: trees I could climb and swing under, and flowers I could smell and pick. I began to see that the landscape of our farm could also be divided into field, forest, “the bottom,” and “the crick.” I now pronounce “the crick” as “the creek” or by its proper name, “Sugarcreek.” I was continuing to organize my world into more and more categories the each seemed quite distinct.
My parents gave me many chores to do and I learned to be responsible by feeding the chickens, gathering the eggs, forking cow manure, and handling hay bales in summer and winter. I loved books and particularly maps. Boundaries of each state fascinated me because they resembled pieces of a puzzle. I began to realize that although they are restrictive, boundaries are important in keeping order and promoting orderly thinking in every area of life.
On Sunday’s, my parents took us to a white building with a steeple and windows that all pointed upward. This was Dundee Methodist Church where we would gather with friends and other families to sing, hear readings and teachings from the Bible, and do fun things like coloring and eating snacks. As an elementary school child, I was taught by stern but loving Sunday School teachers, several of whom were also my teachers at Dundee Elementary School.
Morality: What is Good and Evil?
My mother used to tell me that during my first years of life, my father would often hold me and whisper in my ears the words, “Johnny is a good boy?” Very likely, before I can remember, I was already learning to associate “good” with behavior or performance that met the approval of my parents. I wanted to please them. At the same time, I tended toward “bad.” There were times that I felt like doing “bad things,” especially when I was with my cousin who also tended toward “bad.” I was learning the difference between telling the truth and telling a lie; and, between having what belonged to me and what did not. When I stole a badge from one of my classmates in 3rd grade, I felt a sense of guilt and I knew I had done wrong. I wondered why that was, and why the guilt went away when my theft was exposed and I was punished.
In Sunday School and church each week, I learned that God is good, and that God had given us Ten Commandments that Jesus later boiled down to two commands: love God above all else, and love our neighbor as much as we love ourselves. Stealing from a classmate and lying to my parents did not show love to God or my neighbor. The fact is, I was sinning—falling short of the mark of what is acceptable to God (James 2: 10). I began to realize that God had given me a conscience to warn me and keep me from sinning, and to unsettle me until I confessed and made things right.
Thankfully, I was blessed with parents who encouraged me to obey God’s command to “honor your father and your mother.” When my world expanded into school and church, I learned the importance of honoring my teachers, my pastor, and my country. Each day, we stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. This exercise helped me to respect authorities who serve “under God” as His agents to make and enforce laws. I began to see that laws set boundaries on what I could and could not do. But laws were good because they protected me by keeping order in our nation and in our communities.
I loved my history classes, but I learned that human freedom comes ultimately from God and obedience to His commands, not from government. From history, I also learned that even leaders in government sometimes break God’s commandments and cause riots and war. It made sense to me that our founders believed in the sinful nature of mankind. Thanks to them, our federal government is divided into three branches to distribute power and provide a system of checks and balances to protect us from those who ignore God’s laws and the laws of government.
During these growing-up years, I learned about “good” and “bad” from my parents, teachers, pastors, friends, and “the media.” At age 10, I became acquainted with characters like Wyatt Earp who was cast as a marshal who was also called “deacon Earp.” I like him because he was a “good” character. He drank milk instead of whiskey, and he shot bad men only to wound them and not to kill. By watching wholesome TV programs, I learned that things turned out well for “good men,” but the “bad men” had to pay a penalty for their actions.
During the 1960’s and 1970’s, I began to notice a blurring of the boundaries between “the good and the bad.” Even cowboy shows portrayed characters that made me question what was right and what was wrong. From the media, and from my cousins and classmates, I was exposed to the attractions of smoking, gambling, immoral sexual images and behavior, and alcohol and drug abuse. While my own body was changing and I was literally “growing up fast,” the voice of my father saying “Johnny is a good boy,” seemed to fade away. I wondered whether I or anyone for that matter could really be “good.” Thankfully, God used the influence of my family, teachers, and church to help me ask deeper questions:
Who am I? Who do I want to be?
What is true? What difference will it make?
What is good and evil? Can I be good?
Beneath all of these questions was the deepest question of all: What is my purpose and destiny?
Justification: What is my purpose and destiny?
During my junior and senior high school years, I was surprised to learn that respected scientists believed that the world as we know it came into being entirely by “natural laws” of physics and chemistry. Gone from my public-school textbooks was any mention of “super-natural” acts of God in creation. It seemed that a great divide was opening up between church and the rest of my world, between Sunday School and the public school; and between the Bible and science.
The growing desire of the ‘60’s and 70’s culture to dismiss the authority of God and the outmoded moral standards of the past was further invigorated by the notion of Darwinian evolution. This trend also affected my answers to who I am, what is true, and what is good and evil. If the world originated and now operates by natural laws without God sustaining it, then is there really any purpose in life? For my life? Who decides what is true and false? Good and bad? Where will I go when I die? What will happen to this world? Does it even matter?
Adding to my adolescent confusion was a series of terrible events of the 1960’s: the Vietnam War and the possibility of being drafted into the armed services, the assassination of the Kennedy brothers and Martin Luther King, and the rise of violence and immorality. Thankfully, I gladly followed my parents’ wishes that I attend Malone College, a Christian college in nearby Canton, OH. Here, I learned much more about the world and how to reason critically about issues of religious faith, science, and culture. My knowledge of the origin of life, creation, and evolution increased but my integration of concepts of science and faith remained incomplete.
My pursuit of a satisfying understanding of the world as an undergraduate, as a husband and father, and then as a graduate student and teacher gave me one major insight: that all of us are constituted in such a way that we must live by a faith in something or someone beyond the material world. That something or someone is more powerful than us. What’s more, we may each have to eventually give account of how we lived between the two dates that will appear on our gravestones. Faith in some higher power leads us to pursue a coherent, internally consistent, and hopefully satisfying way of knowing what is true and real. This pursuit is necessary for us to know who we are (our identity), to discern what is right and wrong, and to adopt a code of ethics and morality that will satisfy any judgment we might incur from the higher power.
At the beginning of this article, we referred to the framework for answering the questions about reality, identity, morality, and destiny as our worldview. My personal biographical sketch reveals how my worldview developed through my parents, family, friends, church, and school. This gradual development over many years until my twenties reached a climax on a single day when I began to see how the pieces all fit together.
A “Second Birthday”
When we began graduate studies at West Virginia University-Morgantown, WV, Abby and I with our young son, Bradley, chose wisely to continue our practice of attending church on Sunday’s. One day in 1972, we were visited by two laymen, Leroy and Pearl who were lay leaders from the church. After casual conversation, Leroy asked me if I had come to a place in my spiritual life that I could be certain that if I were to die today that I would go to Heaven. “Yes,” I said.
Probing a bit further, Leroy asked a second question: “Then let’s suppose you were to die and stand before God and He were to ask you, ‘Why should I let you into my Heaven?’ What would you say?” After explaining that I had tried to keep the Ten Commandments, the men explained politely from the Bible that it is “not by works of our own righteousness,” but “according to God’s mercy” that we can be saved from judgment and its penalty of eternal separation from God (Titus 3: 5; Romans 6: 23). They explained how God had already been working in my life from the beginning, gradually helping me to realize that the answer to my questions of reality, identity, morality, and destiny all are found in God, the “Great I AM,” the “Eternally Existent One.” All I had to do was to surrender my own pride and imperfect efforts of self-righteousness, come to realize that God wants to give me His righteousness, and then invite Him through His Holy Spirit to come into my heart, take the “throne of my life” and lovingly enable me to learn to live in a way that is pleasing in His sight according to His Word.
The day the two men visited and led me in a prayer of confession of my sin and heard my profession of a willingness to turn from sin and self to serve God was my “second birthday.” Since that day 50 years ago, I don’t wish the impossible; namely, that I could live as a perfect man. God knows that I still live with a sin nature in a world infected by the curse of sin/rebellion against God. But, with Paul the Apostle, I can say and hopefully live out the testimony that I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet; but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus (Philippians 3: 13-14).
Sharing Our Best Gift
When we find something that means all the world to us, loving our neighbor makes us want to share it with them. Likewise, those of us who have come to realize that Jesus is the “precious Cornerstone” (1 Peter 2:6-8) upon which our worldview is built are also compelled by the Holy Spirit to share Him with others (2 Corinthians 5: 13-21). We want to share the Good News of how God took on flesh through Jesus Christ, demonstrated His grace and Truth (John 1: 17), then died on a Roman cross in our place, and rose from the dead in victory over sin and its penalty—eternal separation (spiritual death) from God forever (1 Corinthians 15: 1-8).
We must also realize that Jesus is the “Cornerstone” and foundation for Truth and Life. But He is also “a stone that causes people to stumble and a rock that makes them fall (1 Peter 2: 8).” Those who deny both God’s living Word (Jesus Christ) and God’s written Word (the Bible) are offended upon hearing the claim that (emphasis added) salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved (Acts 4: 12). Jesus said, I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except by me (John 14: 6).
Because the “Good News” brings a stark reality that is often personal, painful, and provocative, we ought to be humble and respectful to those with whom we share it. After all, we wouldn’t want others to foist even their best gift on us without consideration of our worldview. Remember, we are all sinners (Romans 3: 10, 23) and all of us are trying to make sense of reality, identity, morality, and destiny. Best of all, God loves us all (John 3: 16).
What then should be my approach toward sharing “Good News” that is truly “good” but also provocative? The Bible gives “born-again” Christ-followers the best approach to sharing the Gift of salvation and Eternal Life. It states, But sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, but with gentleness and respect… (1 Peter 3: 15). This was the approach of Leroy and Pearl, “gentleness and respect,” when they confronted me with my need for salvation from sin. I want this to be my approach, too. I hope and pray that my readers will receive my testimony in this article with the gentleness and respect that I intend.
Can You Define Your Worldview?
Thank you for reading. If you have any questions about what I have shared or would like to comment on this article, just use the “Comments” link below. As always, when you “Comment,” you add much value to my blog. Please allow me to pose some questions to stir up your thinking for your personal reflection and/or posted comments:
1. How would you describe your worldview?
2. Does it include your basis for truth, your identity, morality, and destiny?
3. How do you see your worldview influencing your values and choices?
4. Do you agree with my statement that “all of us are constituted in such a way that we must live by a faith in something or someone beyond the material world.” Why or why not?
5. According to a survey of 2,000 adult Americans by the American Worldview Inventory 2021, over half (54%) embrace the postmodern idea that all truth is subjective and there are no moral absolutes. How would you explain this finding?
6. Would you like to know more about God’s “Good News” and how to respond to it? Check out an online source entitled, “Have You Made the Wonderful Discovery of the Spirit-Filled Life?” It explains how you can surrender your life to Christ, gain peace with God through His Life, and begin to see the world and your life from God's perspective through His Holy Spirit dwelling in you. Again, you may respond by posting a “Comment” (below) or by e-mailing to silviusj@gmail.edu
Related Readings:
Stewards ‘Fit into’ God’s Order and Purpose – Human need to “fit in.” Oikonomia from 2012
Hearing the Voice of Jesus –2: When Suffering Comes – How my faith strengthened in 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


































