When I was in my twenties and engaged to be married, I ran across an article entitled “Are There Limits to Intimacy.” I confess that I was intrigued by the question because, in my naïve state of mind, I was thinking of “intimacy” only in terms of sexual intimacy. The article did touch on sexuality in marriage, but the author focused mainly on the deeper question of what fosters intimacy in any relationship—friendship, sibling, marriage, etc.
Why the ”Intimacy Question”?
During our 55 years together, Abby and I have been blessed in our marriage and
family, and in relationships with our friends. Still from time to time, the topic of “limits to
intimacy” arises in our conversation, especially when we have disagreements
that can jiggle our calm, or when we read the disturbing statistics about the
state of relationships in our current culture.
The Harvard study is not alone in revealing the extent of loneliness in our culture. Therefore, the question, “Are there limits to intimacy?” becomes even more relevant. Most of us who value relationships with other people would naturally be interested in this question. Whether in our marriages or in our friendships with others, we want close relationships that grow and endure the test of time in spite of our sinful natures.
If there are limits to intimacy, and it is obvious there are, what are they, and how can minimizing or eliminating them produce closer, more fulfilling relationships? If you are still reading, we will assume you are already asking these questions and thinking of some answers from your experiences. Therefore, our approach will be to define what is meant by “intimacy” and then to raise some questions we have been asking about “limits to intimacy.” Finally, we will invite you to share your perspectives based on your faith and experiences by using the “Comments” link.
“Intimacy” Defined
As noted earlier, intimacy is often defined within the context of sexual relations, but its meaning is much broader. As a noun, an intimate can mean a “close friend.” As an adjective, intimate is used to describe the closeness of a relationship where the word means “inmost, innermost, deepest.” Taken together, it may be said that intimacy of each member of a relationship requires investment of the whole person in mind, body, and spirit.
Psychologists often define intimacy in terms of four or five types. For example, Dr. Judy Ho, writing in Psychology Today [Read more HERE.], lists five (5) types of intimacy quoted as follows:
·
Physical intimacy includes physical touch (both sexual and non-sexual) such
as intercourse, kissing, hugs, cuddling, sitting close together, or holding
hands.
·
Emotional intimacy involves the honest sharing of your thoughts,
feelings, fears, hopes, and/or dreams, and feeling heard and
understood by another person.
·
Intellectual intimacy involves communicating beliefs, viewpoints, and ideas
in a way that creates intellectual stimulation, curiosity, interest, and
acceptance (despite possibly differing vantage points).
·
Experiential intimacy involves doing something together that creates a
shared experience or allows teamwork toward a common
goal.
·
Spiritual intimacy involves sharing moments that bring you a sense of awe, wonder, or
acknowledgement with something bigger than yourself.
We Invite Your Comments
Below are some questions we have been asking about intimacy in relationships. Hopefully, they will help you think more
deeply about limits to intimacy. Because
we think you will want to respond in some way, here are three options from
which you can choose:
1. Ponder the Questions without
commenting. We hope you will personally
gain from it.
2. Posting Your Comment: Make your comment(s) as concise as
possible, but don’t refrain for fear you will be put down. Your comments or questions will add important
insights for others to read. You may use
your first name, or use “Anonymous.”
3. Respond Privately: You may contact us by e-mail using silviusj@gmail.com. Obviously, we want to respect the privacy all
who participate as well as those in our relationships by withholding actual
names (or use a fictitious name if you like).
Here are the questions we offer to engage your thinking about intimacy in
relationships:
1. Think of your closest friend. Is your friendship growing, stable, or
stagnating? What is it that sustains your
friendship and helps you to grow closer? Or, what things currently limit your
closeness? [If your closest friend is
your spouse, then your answers will be a bit different but the questions still
apply.]
2. Are there limits to the closeness or intimacy
that friends or even spouses can attain?
What are hindrances to establishing intimacy between friends or spouses?
3. What is the most fundamental
ingredient to develop and sustain intimacy in any relationship? How does a person or relationship develop
this ingredient?
4. Are there situations in a relationship
in which we are justified when we decide we must refrain from a certain
communication, action, or behavior toward our friend or spouse? What is an objective source or ethical basis
for justifying your decision?
5. Is it possible to establish an
intimate relationship by a social media communication alone? If not, what elements of a genuine intimate
relationship would need to be addressed by other means than social media? Are there applications we can make from this
line of reasoning to address causes of the troubling statistics on loneliness,
depression, etc. we cited above?
6. What role does a person’s spiritual
life, faith, and personal worldview play in developing close, intimate
relationships with others? Would you
consider the spiritual dimension as a primary or secondary ingredient in developing
intimacy in your relationships?
7. How necessary is intimate self-knowing
or self-awareness to our ability to form intimate relationships with another person
or persons? What do you believe is
necessary for growing in knowledge of “self?”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment