Watching Our Words and Hashtags
My first thought was to remember my own current blend of emotions over Floyd’s death and the passion now on display across America—the mixture of grief, disgust, anger, hate, hopelessness, etc. These emotions have also embroiled social media. Even well-meaning posts can erupt into exchanges that express the dark side of our hearts.
I hope not to add to the tensions that already exist among people online. But I am trying to make sense of what is being reported in the media, and through conversations I have had recently. Forgive me, but it helps to write out my thoughts—hopefully, I am not worthlessly “spewing.”
First off, we may agree that virtual conversations involving brief repeated exchanges can easily be misunderstood by our inaccurate wording. Even well worded sentences do not convey the tone of voice or facial expressions we normally see in real-time, face-to-face conversations. On top of this, add a “hashtag” and suddenly, a well-meaning statement can become a flaming arrow with a life of its own, ricocheting about and stabbing into hearts of readers.
Today, “#BlackLivesMatter” is a potentially incendiary hashtag that carries with it much of the hurt, grief, passion, anger, and disgust that is driving both peaceful demonstrations and accompanying looting and violence. I am honestly trying to be sensitive to these emotions. I also believe there is justification for prolonged expression of these emotions along with respectful, impassioned calls for justice and reform. However, it is also evident from the instance I cited at the beginning of this article that the use of #BlackLivesMatter (or other similar expressions--e.g. #BLM, the phrase “Black Lives Matter”), because of the connotations it carries, can easily squelch constructive conversation as well as legitimate public demonstrations.
Evaluating #BlackLivesMatter
As I am trying to understand some of the incendiary nature of #BlackLifesMatter, it seems to me that some who use this slogan have given in to the temptation to appoint themselves as the standard for how all others ought to think and act toward “Blacks” (or other ethnic minorities). With all due respect, they seem to be the self-appointed “high priests of ‘blackness’.” Therefore, to them, because I am “White” (or “white”), nothing I am writing here carries value or authority. Neither am I perceived as one who understands or empathizes with Blacks, Black cultural heritage, or the current struggles of Blacks.
Because of my ethic background and my personal experience, I will admit that I have trouble understanding and empathizing with Black Americans. Nor do I currently experience the kinds of ongoing, subtle or outright emotional and physical causes of anxiety, suffering, and death that have been or are currently being experienced by Blacks. But then, who is worthy to represent Black lives and to define its mission? And who possesses the authority to decide when the #BlackLivesMatter mission is accomplished? And what will the area now occupied by the United States of America look like when the mission is accomplished? The answers to these questions are not obvious to me but they would appear to be at least somewhat elusive. In fact, many people wonder whether the Black Lives Matter movement has any consensus as to its actual mission and desired outcome. For example, here are several points I’ve been pondering.
Biology and Politics of “Black”
First, we would assume “the worthy” person or persons of #BlackLivesMatter ought to be “Black.” But how “Black?” Biologically speaking, I have explained elsewhere that humankind is of one race, not many. How black must a person’s skin be in order to be “Black?” Or how “White” in order to be disqualified? According to D. J. Witherspoon, S. Wooding, et al. publishing in the journal, Genetics (176: 351–359 May, 2007), “…most human genetic variation is found within populations, not between them.” Rob DeSalle and Ian Tattersall, both at the American Museum of Natural History, conclude, “race is a totally inadequate way of characterizing diverse humankind or even of helping understand humanity’s glorious variety.” [See “Black History 3: Bible and Biology Erase Racism”].
There are many Blacks such as Ben Carson (@SecretaryCarson), Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO), and Jack Brewer (@JackBrewerBSI) who disagree with the tenants of Black Lives Matter. Therefore, some in #BlackLivesMatter dismiss these Blacks because they are not really “Black.” Legitimate voices from both “Blacks” and “Whites” are rejected or silenced, often by both #BlackLivesMatter and some media outlets, if they do not meet the standard of “the worthy.” But what constitutes the “standard” for being among “the worthy?”
Individual versus Institutional Sin
Turning our attention to a major source of the passionate cry for justice, our law enforcement officials across the nation, it is clear in at least some cases that there is need for reform, greater accountability, and justice to those who are proven guilty of abuse of their authority. George Floyd would likely be alive today if Derek Chauvin had been held accountable for multiple earlier violations of proper police guidelines. But, while it seems clear that Chauvin and his colleagues who were complicit in the murder of George Floyd should be charged and sentenced for their grievous crime, some in #BlackLivesMatter claim that all police regardless of ethnicity, professional record, or character are unworthy to be our protectors or enforcers of the law. In fact, #DisbandPolice movements are emerging in major cities on the premise that all police are unworthy.
If Black Lives really Matter, how can anyone who cares about Black Lives support dismissal of entire police departments and leave some of the most vulnerable communities including Black communities vulnerable to what will undoubtedly become vigilante law? Here we can see the illogic of “throwing out the whole barrel of apples” when one or two “bad apples” are discovered. It is both biblically and legally justified to condemn individuals who commit acts that clearly stem from bigotry. It is also right to identify and reform institutions guilty of “institutional racism”—i.e. where one or few “bad apples” have spread their “rot” to the point of corrupting the mission and purpose of the institution. However, it cannot be either biblically or legally justified to condemn a whole institution for the actions of one or a few. This point brings us to the social media exchange I noted at the beginning.
Church Discipline or Demolition?
The following is a Facebook post from my friend followed by a response from one of his/her friends:
FRIEND: The decline of Christianity in Europe and North America, whatever its proximate causes may be, is ultimately God saving the Church from white supremacy. God can, in his time, rebuild what he tears down. But now is a time for tearing down (Ecclesiastes 3:3). Let us not be found opposing God’s will. I’m sure others have already said this, and I confess I am late in seeing it clearly.
RESPONSE: Yes!! Thank you, __ (name)! The church has been one of, if not THE main agent in perpetuating white supremacy.
I love my friend and his/her family. We have been friends for many years. I do not know his/her friend. I also understand and respect his/her genuine concern and desire for the Church to flourish in all of her roles on Earth to proclaim the good news of salvation, release to the captives held by sin’s bonds, to bring man sons to glory, and to glorify our God and Savior, Jesus Christ. But I also understand the tremendous diversity that exists within the true Church and within Bible-based local churches. Therefore, I resist the pessimism that many seem to have.
Some local churches are almost entirely Caucasian, others are a mix of many ethnic groups, and some are almost entirely Black. Our church is largely Caucasian. Therefore, we may be unknowingly naïve or ignorant of ethnic diversity and struggles. Ignorance is not sin unless we are not teachable and allow it to lead to wrong judgments. We are fortunate to have a godly Black man who is married to a lovely Caucasian wife who serve on our pastoral staff. We can learn from their example and teaching, first as our brother and sister in Christ, and secondly from the insights on cultural diversity which they bring to us. But most of all, where the Scriptures are taught and sincerely followed, and where even biology is understood, there ought not to be a hint of bigotry or white supremacy.
Here, we must return to our question, “Who is Worthy?” Specifically, who among #BlackLivesMatter is worthy to pass judgment on a local church, or upon “the Church” worldwide? For those who reject the authority of God and His inspired Word in Scripture, nothing beyond this point in the article will be agreeable to you—I understand your rejection for reasons you can find taught in the New Testament. If you are currently choosing to reject the teachings of the Bible, please consider what Jesus Himself taught in His parable of the sower and the seed (Luke 8: 5-15) and what the Apostle Paul taught in 1 Corinthians 2: 6-16. Personally, neither can I discern these truths apart from God’s love and His grace that opened my eyes spiritually. Regardless of our personal choices, we must be assured of this: All men and women are created to live under authority—the question is which authority will we choose or allow? If not our government and our local justice system, then who? And will that authority have our good interests in mind? Sadly, anarchist views are being directed toward both local police and toward our children to incite them to defy their parents.
Church Discipline and Restoration
Based on the authority of Scripture, I also find no teaching in Scripture that licenses an individual to judge a local church or “the Church (worldwide).” That right is reserved for God Himself and His Son Jesus Christ who condemned proud, corrupt religious leaders (e.g. Matthew 23). He wept out loud over His holy city (Matthew 23: 37; Luke 19:41-44) and promised stern judgment against apostate and lukewarm local churches (Revelation 2 and 3).
But what if there are indications of bigotry among God’s people in a local church today? The Scriptures teach the individual born-again believer how to interact in the body of Christ. We find particularly in Paul’s Epistles instruction for right living for husbands, wives, children, employees, church leaders, etc. The focus is on individual responsibility and accountability before God for how we conduct ourselves in relation to God and toward our neighbor, whether they are a brother or sister in Christ or an unsaved person-- and we are to make no distinction between ethnic groups (1 Corinthians 12: 13; Galatians 3: 28 and Colossians 3: 1-17, especially v. 11). Bigotry is a sin against God and our neighbor!
The Scriptures give clear instructions that it is the responsibility of mature Christ-followers to confront a brother or sister in Christ who is believed to be living in sin. Galatians 2: 1-2 states, Brothers and sisters, if someone is caught in a sin, you who live by the Spirit should restore that person gently. But watch yourselves, or you also may be tempted. Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ [which, see Gal. 5: 14, is to love our neighbor as we love ourselves]. Jesus outlined our responsibility as individuals if we are offended to go directly to the offender privately (Matthew 18: 15) and if he or she doesn’t repent and turn from the sin, bring one or two others with you and confront again (v. 16). If he or she still refuses, then the whole church membership should hear the matter and if there is still no repentance, the offender is to be dismissed from the local membership as a step toward their repentance and loving restoration when that occurs. When local churches practice godly discipline, individual sin of any kind does not become “institutional sin.”
The question remains, “Who is Worthy?” Answer? None of us is ultimately worthy to judge his or her neighbor, regardless of ethnicity or spiritual condition for the purpose of condemnation. Nor are we worthy to condemn our parents (Exodus 20: 12, the fifth Commandment), our churches, the Church, or our institutions of government for God has placed rulers in authority over us for our good (Romans 13). Instead of pessimistically judging and condemning individuals and institutions, we are to exercise stewardship, living as salt and light to others—one at a time (Matthew 5: 10-16), even in our dutiful confrontation where necessary.
The Life and Death that Matters Most
In all of these claims, my authority is the Lord Jesus Christ who suffered the most unjust and horrible death imaginable, and He alone is with without any sin. Read carefully Isaiah 53 and allow God’s Word to speak truth into your heart—Jesus died not only for your sin and mine, but also for our sorrow, our grief, our frustration. Let us look into our own “black hearts” which can so easily express the fallen tendency of our sinful nature (Galatians 5: 16-21). At the foot of Christ’s Cross, we see how much He suffered to take away sin from us (1 John 3: 5). Praise God! May God help us to adopt a lifestyle of repentance of our sin and arise in new life, yielded daily to the work of the Holy Spirit in us. He alone can produce the Fruit pleasing to God and a blessing to our neighbor—Love, Joy, Peace, Patience, etc. (Galatians 5: 22-26).
How About You and I?
Do you and I need to “call ourselves out” to repentance (James 1: 19-27)?
If we do, repentance will help us rightly
discern the error in the spirit behind #BlackLivesMatter. Perhaps we will be directed to live by #BlackHeartsMatter, being among those who look first into our own hearts, taking the log out of our own eye
first before pointing to sin in our brother or sister (Matthew 7: 3-5). Above all, we must never forget that no one is truly Worthy
except our Savior, our Redeemer, our Counselor, and our Friend. Why not take time, as I want to do again, to
read carefully the Scriptures I have cited in this article, especially Colossians 3: 1-17. Let's allow God’s
Spirit to speak His Truth to our hearts? I would
recommend while you read, to listen to Chris Tomlin’s lovely song, “He is Worthy.” Indeed, only Christ is Worthy!
I appreciate your handling of this matter from a spiritual perspective. I believe it is first and foremost spiritual - in so many ways. Floyd's life was clearly a spiritual mess. But then "there is none righteous, not one. All our righteousness is as filthy rags." The cops in this case were careless about Floyds lif - an understatement, to say the least. And the public response has been overwhelmingly violent and evil against anyone and everyone in their way.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, it has been completely emotionalized. Rather than allowing it to be handled by the judicial system, race-baiters and the media and the Democrats have taken it into the public realm and used it to stir up all kinds of horrible, negative feelings in absolutely everyone that hears of it regardless how far removed. Victim mentality reigns supreme and you are automatically guilty and culpable if you aren't of the right persuasion.
The Democrats have long virtue-signalled by allying themselves with Black Lives Matter, which is little more than a terrorist organization (like AntiFa) that is being given free rein to riot violently, causing whatever harm they can with little to no threat of being held accountable for their actions.
Like the COVID-19 pandemic, this has become a crisis that is almost completely agenda driven - the actual victims are no longer the issue. There are people who thrive on creating apocalyptic level chaos out of tragic events if it accomplishes their desired goals.
As you stated, in agreement with MLK (and his niece, Alveda King) there is only one race - the human race. We are all made of the same material by the same Creator and Sustainer. From the beginning, the devil has fought God's plan of Redemption by taking a little truth and spinning it with a lot of deception to evoke in humanity emotions and actions that are harmful to the entirety of creation. That is what he has done with COVID-19 and that's what he's doing with this BLM crisis.
All we have to do is get some distance from it and ask what is actually being emphasized and prioritized by these different events and actors? Is it facts or is it emotions? Did the extreme fear and hate mongering, anger and divisiveness start (and will it end) with these two events? Is there anything anyone can do (or should do) to improve conditions and bring it all to an end? Will anything bring satisfaction?
If you cannot see the enemy's agenda, you cannot win the war. You will continue to lose battles until you understand the enemy and his tactics. Once Truth shines light on the evil strategies, they lose their effectiveness. Then people can ally themselves with righteousness to accomplish the Creator's agenda instead of the enemy's.
None of these issues should be seen by themeselves. There have been, are, and will be NUMEROUS others used to tear down our society and transform it into something our founders worked with blood, swet, and tears fight against culminating in the writing of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights for the United States of America. We should not be deceived or let down our guard against those who would destroy that. Too many have sacrificed too much to just give in and allow tyrany to take over.
I'll end with this: Lloyd Marcus gives his insightful perspective on this issue in the following article, well worth the read. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/disciples_of_the_gospel_of_democrats_and_fake_news_media_.html
Thank you, Ken, for taking time to read and then to write your well reasoned reply. I'm sorry the Blogger platform doesn't act more user friendly. Be that as it may, thanks for trying to work with it. Your reply was an excellent complementary piece and I especially liked your paragraph,
ReplyDeleteNone of these issues should be seen by themselves. There have been, are, and will be NUMEROUS others used to tear down our society and transform it into something our founders worked with blood, sweat, and tears fight against culminating in the writing of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights for the United States of America. We should not be deceived or let down our guard against those who would destroy that. Too many have sacrificed too much to just give in and allow tyranny to take over.
Your added content regarding the store customer exchange is very illustrative and, as you say, may not be a true account. However, I believe we both will agree that this behavior does occur, how frequently I don't know. Our Mindy has observed at Walmart when she is leaving the store the tendency for checkers to favor Blacks, and she plans to press this a bit when she has opportunity by asking why they don't ask for her receipt. In this connection, for every ethnicity, Romans 13: 3-4, For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
I also appreciated the concise and polite expression of frustration of Lloyd Marcus in The American Thinker. The reluctance of many Americans of any ethnicity to think for themselves and follow consistent logic is an all-to-common phenomenon; but, as Mr. Marcus points out, the Scriptures bear this out and encourage us that we are not alone. That is enough to encourage us not to give up on either prayer or our people.
Incidentally, Ben Carson addresses this in a very encouraging video clip at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzQrWnj7vaA&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3RHRxr1XBR-DD3l0_opvcrNCwgyC_6ClobYSRuWlp6Aww4RLIfwbSEEZ8
I especially was encouraged by Carson's (with more passion than he usually can project) mention of the history of President Trump's respect for an work on behalf of Black Americans.