LOVE: Part 1 - What the World Needs Most

On April 15, 1965, just six weeks before my graduation from high school, an album of Jackie DeShannon was released that included a song that has become very familiar: 

What the world needs now is love, sweet love
It's the only thing that there's just too little of
What the world needs now is love, sweet love
No not just for some but for everyone – Hal David

The enduring popularity of “What the World Needs Now Is Love” reflects Hal David’s gift of creating lyrics that resonated with the “interior sadness of daily life;” in particular, the human longing for the sweetness of enduring love.  From what I have read, it seems unlikely that Hal David and musician Burt Bacharach intended their song to be understood from a biblical perspective.  However, the song is both a commentary on human nature and a prayer to God to send more of His love.  The commentary and the prayer remain very pertinent to this day.

Hal David used an additional line in his “prayer” to intensify his point that “the world needs love.”  The song continues, “Lord, we don’t need another mountain.”  Rather, we just need more “sweet love.”

As I listened again to David’s lyrics wafting sadly on the wings of Bacharach’s music, I began to wonder:  Is the world’s problem really that it has too little love?  Or, could it be that there is plenty of love, but many of us have been seeking a lesser love and looking for it in the wrong places?   The answer from the Bible is “yes.” 

The Apostle John, whom Jesus loved, tells us that God loved the world so much that He gave what is often described as His great “love gift” in the form of His beloved Son, Jesus (John 3: 16).   Years after recording those words of Jesus, John declared in 1 John 4: 8, “God is love.”  By this, he meant, that God’s divine Son, Jesus, is not only His “love gift” to the world but Jesus is the very embodiment of love.  And Jesus spoke of His Father’s love to His disciples in this way: “As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you; abide in my love (John 15: 9).”  As we abide in Jesus’s love, His love, joy, and peace flow out from us to others.  The Apostle John affirms the reality of this flowing stream of love from God through us to others: “We love, because He (God) first loved us (1 John 4: 19).

But, while God’s sweet love is abundantly available, the world continues to plead for more
“love, sweet love” while looking for it where it cannot be found.  Nathanael Blake, in Why Everything Is Wonderful But Nobody’s Happy, And What To Do About It, addresses the concern of many today who realize the inability of material pursuits to substitute for “sweet love.” He laments[JS1] :

…the symptoms of civilizational despair are persistent and worsening. The doleful litany is familiar: Fertility and life expectancy are down; suicides are up; overdose deaths are way up…deaths from alcohol abuse are up. The comforts of modern life have not made us happy, even as material comforts that were once exclusive to the rich have become the norm. Never before in human history have so many, with so much, been so miserable.  Nor has sexual liberation, the last, best hope for materialist pleasure, brought general happiness. …widespread sexual indulgence has left our culture so far from sexual bliss that even The New York Times is running columns lamenting our sexual dystopia.

It seems that Western culture can achieve every goal set before it except to agree upon what  is truly satisfying and enduring.  As social beings, our relational, vocational, recreational, and spiritual lives are incomplete unless we achieve satisfying relationships with others and with God.  We long for assurance and security that can only come from a deeper well than our buckets will reach.  And so, many continue to look for love, meaning, and purpose in vain.  Our frustration from this vain pursuit may explain recent political division and unrest.

Blake suggests that our anxiety over unsatisfied wants is at least partly the cause of the growing percentage of the American electorate who are infatuated with socialism.   However, he notes that expanding government programs are not the answer because prophets, philosophers, and preachers throughout the ages have reminded us, happiness does not consist of the satisfaction of our material desires, for they will never be satisfied. Desire expands to fill the imagination’s capacity.

On the other hand, social and political conservatism holds that true freedom is granted by God, not by government.   We are accountable to God as stewards of His gifts and opportunities to honor Him and benefit our neighbor, not as a means to amass wealth for our own gratification (Ephesians 4: 28).  As Blake explains, those who know that complete happiness is not found in this life…can have gratitude for our material blessings and relief from physical ills, without seeking our happiness in wealth. We can cultivate those virtues (such as humility, charity, patience, and self-control) that mitigate social conflict, and discourage vices (such as envy, pride, jealousy, and lust) that inflame them.

We can also provide an account of human flourishing that explains why happiness and heartbreak are linked. Happiness requires accepting our mortality, but our culture sanitizes and cordons-off death and neglects the philosophical and religious reflection that reconciles us to death and prepares us for it. What our culture needs—recognition of the realities of human nature, the instilling of self-control, living with love and charity in community, and offering hope for the hereafter—is what churches should be preaching and, more importantly, exemplifying.

Unfortunately, we frequently fail in these things (I very much include myself in this indictment), and we will have little to offer an unhappy culture if we are anxious, defensive, and hateful toward our political and cultural opponents. If we do not want those we disagree with to be happy; if we do not model a life of joy for them, why should they bother to listen to us?

The Life and teachings of Jesus as recorded in our New Testament left an unmistakable mark on Christ-followers of the first-century church as described in the Book of Acts.  When the Roman Emperor Hadrian sent a man named Aristides to spy upon the Christians, his report to the Emperor contained these words, "Behold! How they love one another."  The power of Christ’s love among first century Christ-followers was the key to the rapid spread of the “Good News” of salvation across Europe.

Like our world today, the Roman world of the first century was hungry for “love, sweet love”—that ‘greater love’ that comes from God through the “Love Gift” of His Son, Jesus Christ.   In our world where many of us are materially rich but many are also anxious, unfulfilled, and in despair, may we who have God’s love be committed to express His love and lovingkindness (mercy) where it is so badly needed.  Perhaps the lyrics of “Jesus, Friend of Sinners” by Casting Crowns describes our marching orders as redeemed sinners called to love lost sinners:

Jesus, friend of sinners, we have strayed so far away
We cut down people in your name but the sword was never ours to swing
Jesus, friend of sinners, the truth's become so hard to see
The world is on their way to You but they're tripping over me
Always looking around but never looking up I'm so double minded
A plank eyed saint with dirty hands and a heart divided

Oh Jesus, friend of sinners
Open our eyes to the world at the end of our pointing fingers
Let our hearts be led by mercy
Help us reach with open hearts and open doors
Oh Jesus, friend of sinners, break our hearts for what breaks yours

----------------------------------
Coming Next:  In “LOVE: Part 2 – It's "Out of This World” I want to consider how love is defined and shared through our actions.

The Rising Spirit of “the Resistance”

Nearly two years into President Donald Trump’s administration, there has hardly been a week without a new accusation or allegation questioning his legal, or moral, or psychological fitness for the office to which he was elected.  This week was no exception.

First, came the release of Bob Woodward’s new book, Fear:  Trump in the White House (Simon & Schuster).  According to The NY Times, the book “portrays a White House with relentless infighting and a work culture so toxic and volatile that many of President Trump’s top advisers and cabinet members became accustomed to working around their boss, whom they described as unstable and uninformed.”  President Trump and many “top advisors and cabinet members” deny the validity of Woodward’s claims.

Then came the second punch at the President.  On Wednesday, The NY Times, fresh from its commentary on Woodward’s Fear, published an anonymous op-ed letter allegedly written by a member of President Trump’s senior staff.   “Anonymous” confirmed much of Woodward’s account as he/she purports to speak for “the resistance” within the Executive Branch.  “The resistance” allegedly wants the President to succeed while at the same time to protect him from his most dangerous instincts.

Vice President Mike Pence and President Trump’s top advisors and cabinet members have all denied that they are “Anonymous.”  President Trump has labelled this op-ed and “the resistance” as treason, and rightly so.  If “Anonymous” is indeed a top administration official, he/she poses a serious threat to the security of the President and to our nation.  Especially disconcerting is what can be read as a veiled threat by “Anonymous” that “we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.”

Even if everything “Anonymous” has written is accurate, I believe this action by one individual or a group of unelected individuals charged with the privilege of serving in the Executive Branch of the United States government is arrogant, unethical, and dangerous.  If “Anonymous” believes so strongly in the cause of “the resistance,” why not resign and present his/her case in the public forum along with other allegations against President Trump such as his alleged collusion with Russia which has been investigated for nearly two years without substantive proof?

In spite of the unsettling events that have occurred this week, perhaps we can learn from them.  For instance, should we be surprised at the actions of “the resistance,” regardless of how well intended they are?  Hasn’t our culture become increasingly disrespectful of people in positions of authority?   Is our culture any different than that of the Roman Empire in which the Apostle Paul was a prisoner under the deranged and ruthless emperor, Nero?  Surely, Paul would advise Christ-followers to take some action to “resist” Nero, wouldn’t he?

However, as recorded in 2 Timothy 3: 1-4, Paul wrote,

You should know this, Timothy, that in the last days there will be very difficult times. For people will love only themselves and their money. They will be boastful and proud, scoffing at God, disobedient to their parents, and ungrateful. They will consider nothing sacred. They will be unloving and unforgiving; they will slander others and have no self-control. They will be cruel and hate what is good. They will betray their friends, be reckless, be puffed up with pride, and love pleasure rather than God.

What are these Scriptures teaching us as Americans, blessed with much more freedom than Roman citizens like Paul experienced under Nero?   Maybe the most obvious lesson is found in Paul’s prediction of what I believe we are now seeing in full bloom; namely, how “disobedience to parents” and ungratefulness has been expanding from our homes into a spirit of rebellion against teachers and civil authorities.  This week, it has reached all the way up to the Commander-in-Chief.  And we should remember, President Trump is not an authoritarian monarch like Emperor Nero, but rather, the leader of the Executive Branch of our federal government, elected by the will of the American people.

So, I am asking what I would do as a Christ-follower if I were “Anonymous” or if I were a colleague who knew him/her?”  I’m not sure, but as a citizen and Christ-follower, I think I would begin by reading and meditating on Paul’s charge to Timothy in verses 10-17.  This is a very uplifting passage for a time such as this week.  May I encourage you to take time to read and meditate on it?  Paul’s earlier charge to Timothy, in 1 Timothy 2: 1-5, calls us to a posture of prayer in submission to our leaders as well as to the purpose of our Heavenly Father who wants everyone to be saved:

Pray this way for kings and all who are in authority so that we can live peaceful and quiet lives marked by godliness and dignity. This is good and pleases God our Savior, who wants everyone to be saved and to understand the truth. For there is only one God and one Mediator who can reconcile God and humanity—the man Christ Jesus.

Whoever “Anonymous” is, I’m confident in the outcome.  As important as presidents have been in our history, America owes its exceptionalism to the faithfulness of God Who has so often surrounded presidents with men and women of great faith and integrity.  Thankfully, President Trump is in very good company.  My place is simply to pray for our President and for “all who are in authority.”

Recommended Reading:  “Who is in Charge of the White House?” by Dr. Mark Caleb Smith, Associate Professor of Political Science and the Director of the Center for Political Studies at Cedarville University, in the blog, Bereans at the Gate.